临床微生物学档案

  • 国际标准期刊号: 1989-8436
  • 期刊 h 指数: 22
  • 期刊引用分数: 7.55
  • 期刊影响因子: 6.38
索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 全球影响因子 (GIF)
  • 开放档案倡议
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普罗奎斯特传票
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 谷歌学术
  • Scimago期刊排名
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
  • 研究之门
分享此页面

抽象的

Microbial Genomics: Genome Sequencing

Dr. Komalikha Rizavi

Bacterial genomes are generally smaller and less variant in size among species when compared with genomes of eukaryotes. Bacterial genomes can range in size anywhere from about 130 kbp to over 14 Mbp. A study that included, but was not limited to, 478 bacterial genomes, concluded that as genome size increases, the number of genes increases at a disproportionately slower rate in eukaryotes than in non-eukaryotes [1]. Thus, the proportion of non-coding DNA goes up with genome size more quickly in non-bacteria than in bacteria. This is consistent with the fact that most eukaryotic nuclear DNA is non-gene coding, while the majority of prokaryotic, viral, and organellar genes are coding. Right now, we have genome sequences from 50 different bacterial phyla and 11 different archaeal phyla. Second-generation sequencing has yielded many draft genomes (close to 90% of bacterial genomes in GenBank are currently not complete); third-generation sequencing might eventually yield a complete genome in a few hours. The genome sequences reveal much diversity in bacteria. Analysis of over 2000 Escherichia coli genomes reveals an E. coli core genome of about 3100 gene families and a total of about 89,000 different gene families. Genome sequences show that parasitic bacteria have 500–1200 genes, free-living bacteria have 1500–7500 genes, and archaea have 1500–2700 genes [2]. A striking discovery by Cole et al. described massive amounts of gene decay when comparing Leprosy bacillus to ancestral bacteria. Studies have since shown that several bacteria have smaller genome sizes than their ancestors did. Over the years, researchers have proposed several theories to explain the general trend of bacterial genome decay and the relatively small size of bacterial genomes. Compelling evidence indicates that the apparent degradation of bacterial genomes is owed to a deletional bias.