神经病学和神经科学杂志

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2171-6625
  • 期刊 h 指数: 17
  • 期刊引用分数: 4.43
  • 期刊影响因子: 3.38
索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 全球影响因子 (GIF)
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普罗奎斯特传票
  • 科学期刊影响因子 (SJIF)
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
分享此页面

抽象的

Disciplinary screening of electroencephalography (EEG) referrals by neurologist ameliorates healthcare use economy

Mohammed Gomaa*

Background: Electroencephalogram (EEG) serves a vital role in screening and diagnosing epileptic patients because it is a noninvasive tool to reveal the aberrant cortical excitability underlying epilepsy. To compare EEG results in adult neurophysiology units, Neurology department, Fayoum university hospitals according to the specialty of referring physicians. This retrospective survey included 1413 consecutive EEG referrals to exclude epilepsy. Epileptic patients admitted for EEG repetition for follow-up concerns were eliminated. Patients were classified into Four groups of EEG referrals. Group I was referred directly by neurologists, group II by psychiatrists, group III by neurosurgeons, and group IV was referred by physicians of other specialties.

Results: Among group I, 493 EEG referrals (252 abnormal, 51.1%). Group II, 134 EEG referrals (41 abnormal, 30.6%). Group III, 68 EEG referrals (23abnormal, 33.8%). Lastly, 718 EEG referrals were among group IV (181 abnormal, 25.2%). The p-value (0.0001) indicated a significant difference among study groups. A higher percentage of abnormal EEG results was noticed among neurologist referrals relative to other groups.

Conclusion: Review of EEG referrals by neurologist leading to a decrease in the number of normal EEG results and better stream of diagnosis and management. Incorporating data from referral reports with detailed history taking and provisional diagnosis is recommended to decrease the number of improper EEG referrals for non-epileptic patients by better using healthcare resources.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证