转化生物医学

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2172-0479
  • 期刊 h 指数: 16
  • 期刊引用分数: 5.91
  • 期刊影响因子: 3.66
索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 研究圣经
  • 全球影响因子 (GIF)
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普罗奎斯特传票
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
  • 研究之门
分享此页面

抽象的

Currently Available Rapid Microbial Tests for Translational Medicine

Hanayuki Okura and Akifumi Matsuyama

Rapid microbial tests ensure testing in rapid and accurate manners at reasonable costs. The ideal test should achieve detection of certain types of microorganisms that are undetected by the pharmacopoeia-defined sterility tests and its accuracy should be confirmed by regulatory authorities. The use of pharmacopoeia sterility tests is limited since they can detect only microorganisms that are viable only in specified media. A rapid test that can detect viable bacteria and microbes that cannot be cultured and never fails in bacterial detection, should appeal to the regulatory authorities. In the agar mediumculture system employed in the pharmacopoeia-microbial test, the test results may be erroneously false negative when the viable bacteria fail to grow under the defined incubation conditions, when inhibitors are present in the test sample, or when scientific approaches are not available to differentiate negative from false negative results. On the other hand, rapid microbial tests with false positive results due to noise caused by detection principle, measurement device, or non-biologic positive substance, imposes huge industrial challenges. In this review, we discuss the rapid microbial tests classified according to various systems for detection of microorganisms and their application, and then introduce some commercial applications of existing devices for detection of microorganisms and provide details of microbial test features, and compare the purposes of the microbial tests.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证