转化生物医学

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2172-0479
  • 期刊 h 指数: 16
  • 期刊引用分数: 5.91
  • 期刊影响因子: 3.66
索引于
  • 打开 J 门
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 期刊目录
  • 研究圣经
  • 全球影响因子 (GIF)
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 西马戈
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普罗奎斯特传票
  • 普布隆斯
  • 米亚尔
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
  • 研究之门
分享此页面

抽象的

Comparison of the Effect of Nanosilver Spray and 1% Silver Sulfadiazine Cream on the Healing of Second-Degree Burn Wound

Azita Dolat Abadi, Mojtaba Vaheb, Rakhshani MH and Tofighian T*

Introduction: Recent scientific advances have led to the availability of silver nanoparticles which can kill microbial agents with their higher power of penetration into them. The present study aimed to compare the effect of nanosilver spray and silver sulfadiazine cream on the healing of second-degree burn wounds.

Materials and methods: A clinical trial was conducted in Vasei Hospital of Sabzevar in 2016. For this purpose, 21 patients with a second-degree burn wound of the same depth and size in one or two organs were selected as the sample based on the convenient sampling method. Wounds of patients were divided into two parts; one part was dressed with silver sulfadiazine cream and the other one was dressed with nanosilver spray. The wound dressing was changed every day after washing the wound with normal saline. Wound parameters including size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue type, necrotic tissue amount, exudate type, exudate amount, skin color surrounding wound, peripheral tissue edema and induration, granulation tissue, and epithelialization were measured on the first, third, seventh, fourteenth, and twenty-first days using Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using the generalized linear model test in SPSS-16.

Findings: The mean recovery status at the beginning of the study and on the twenty-first day was 32.05 ± 2.13 and 13.95 ± 1.68 in the nanosilver spray group and 32.24 ± 2.77 and 14.52 ± 2.46 in the silver sulfadiazine group. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (p=0.87).

Conclusion: Both types of dressing improved the wound and had the same effect on the wound healing. However, since the cost of treatment and pain were lower in dressing with nanosilver, it is more recommended to be used for burn wounds.