临床和实验室研究年鉴

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2386-5180
  • 期刊 h 指数: 17
  • 期刊引用分数: 6.26
  • 期刊影响因子: 5.31
索引于
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
分享此页面

抽象的

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide and Chlorhexidine Gutta Percha Points Against E. faecalis and S. mutans - An In Vitro Study

Anita Rao S*, Ravi Shankar G, Muralidhar T, CS Soonu and Nageshwar Rao B

Aim: To determine the antibacterial effectiveness of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine gutta-percha points against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans

Materials and methods: Eighteen extracted single-rooted human teeth were selected. After decoronation, root canals were prepared by using k files (Mani, Inc, Japan) up to master apical file size of forty. Following autoclave sterilization of these specimens, root canals were incubated at 37°C with E. faecalis and S. mutans for 24 hrs. Specimens were tested by inserting calcium hydroxid(Coltene/WhaledentInc.Germany), chlorhexidine (Roekoactivpoint, Germany) and conventional gutta-percha points (Endomax Guttapercha Points, Dento One Inc) for 1 hr, 3 hrs and 6 hrs respectively. Dentin chips collected after incubation were inoculated into agar plates and following an overnight incubation the colonies grown on agar plates were counted and interpreted as colony forming units. Results were tested statistically by using Friedman test for intragroup comparison at various time periods. One way Anova for intergroup comparison at different time periods. Overall two way Anova for comparison between the groups and the bacteria.

Results: When compared with conventional gutta percha points, calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine gutta-percha points showed significantly lower colony forming units against E. faecalis and S. mutans

Conclusion: Chlorhexidine gutta percha points were more effective against E. faecalis and S. mutans than calcium hydroxide and conventional gutta-percha points.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证