临床和实验室研究年鉴

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2386-5180
  • 期刊 h 指数: 17
  • 期刊引用分数: 6.26
  • 期刊影响因子: 5.31
索引于
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 普布隆斯
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
分享此页面

抽象的

Commentary on Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) vs. Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis

Feng Xian Wei, You Cheng Zhang

For current less-invasive hernia repair study, operation method and repair material were the most important issues [1]. Our study reviewed the current evidence and concluded an advantage of TAPP in clinical feasibility with comparable efficacy compared with TEP. In their correspondence they raised 2 questions in trial quality assessment and combined model, to which we would reply as follows.