卫生系统和政策研究

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2254-9137
  • 期刊 h 指数: 12
  • 期刊引用分数: 1.73
  • 期刊影响因子: 1.81
索引于
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 宇宙IF
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 普布隆斯
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
分享此页面

抽象的

Advancing Indigenous Self-Determination and Patient Involvement in Health Policy

Eleni Gorgemans

This article looks at Japan's public health policies towards infectious illnesses across the world over the last ten years. The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare undertook a narrative evaluation of items from the Infectious Disease Committee and the Tuberculosis Committee between 2010 and 2019. The average number of topics covered at each meeting was 9.7. These committees have talked about countermeasures to reduce the risk of imported infectious diseases like the Ebola virus disease, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, plague, avian influenza, pandemic influenza, and tuberculosis, as well as the burden of indigenous infectious diseases like measles, rubella, and pertussis. Due to these changes in infectious illnesses, the target population is lost, early identification is more challenging, and the market fails. Making an attempt to educate the public, create unique public health policies for production and supply as well as research and development [1]. The recent experience of Coronavirus illness 2019 will further emphasise it in Japan. Over the last ten years, public health policy about global infectious diseases has been one of the primary priorities under the triangle of global infectious disease. However, in the Post-Corona age, public health policy fundamentals are internationally fragile, which might result in the demise of democracy [2]. We must educate ourselves on the historical history of public health policy in order to tackle global infectious illnesses without deviating from the course. 2019 Coronavirus disease Globally, COVID-19 has altered public health ideas and policy [3]. Travel restrictions were in place after Corona [4].

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证