通用外科杂志

  • 国际标准期刊号: 2254-6758
  • 期刊 h 指数: 8
  • 期刊引用分数: 1.33
  • 期刊影响因子: 1.34
索引于
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
分享此页面

抽象的

A Comparison between Two Kidney Transplant Ureteroneocystostomy Techniques: Full-Thickness Single Layer Anastomosis and Lich-Gregoir

Behnam Sanei, Mozaffar Hashemi,  Abbas Tabataei, Razie Jafari and Hamid Reza Jafari

Urinary complications such as urine leak, stricture, ureteric obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux are the most common technical adverse events following A variety of urinary tract reconstructive methods have been proposed and compared to find an ideal method with minimum urinary complications. Today, ureteroneocystostomy is the most common urinary tract reconstructive method utilized in kidney transplantation. The main aim of the present study was to compare urologic complications following the use of FTSL and LG techniques in kidney transplant ureteroneocystostomy in a clinical trial study.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证