健康科学杂志

  • 国际标准期刊号: 1108-7366
  • 期刊 h 指数: 51
  • 期刊引用分数: 10.69
  • 期刊影响因子: 9.13
索引于
  • Genamics 期刊搜索
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • CINAHL 完整
  • 西马戈
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • 大学教育资助委员会
  • 日内瓦医学教育与研究基金会
  • 欧洲酒吧
  • 谷歌学术
  • 夏尔巴罗密欧
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
分享此页面

抽象的

A Comparative Study between Sleeve Suture Technique and Oblique Cut Technique in Arterial Micro-Anastomosis of Size-Mismatched Vessels in a Rat Model

Fatma Youssef Ahmed*, Ebopras Febrbs1, Wael Sakr, Md, Wael Elshaer Md

Background: Microsurgical reconstruction is employed for complex plastic surgery problems when other options don't seem to be satisfactory either functional or aesthetic Aim: to evaluate sleeve suture technique and oblique cut technique in end-to-end micro-anastomosis of vessels with size discrepancy in a Rat model regarding patency of the anastomosis and feasibility of the technique

Methods: Thirteen Samples were included in this study and randomly assigned to either Group Ι (Sleeve suture technique) or Group Ι (Oblique cut technique). The main assessment parameters were anastomosis patency, time of anastomosis, and the number of suture units. Other parameters included anaesthesia consumption, thrombosis rate, and leakage after anastomosis.

Results: Nearly equal patency rates have been found in the two techniques in the animal model, although the invagination technique was faster and technically simpler to perform with less suture unit consumption. The oblique cut technique showed a highly statistically significant increase in the anastomosis time and an increased in sutures number in comparison to the sleeve technique plus the necessity to flip-flop the wall for posterior wall suturing.

Conclusion: No patency advantage of one technique over the other. However, in the experimental model used, it was found that the invagination technique was faster and technically simpler to perform. Flow-through the invagination was nearly equal to that through the oblique cut end-to-end.

免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证